<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Anthony K Valley - Latest Comments in Guns in church bill shot down by Arkansas Senate panel</title><link>http://anthonykvalley.disqus.com/</link><description>Faith, Father, Family Man, Frequent Failure of Frivolous Functions</description><atom:link href="https://anthonykvalley.disqus.com/guns_in_church_bill_shot_down_by_arkansas_senate_panel/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:48:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Guns in church bill shot down by Arkansas Senate panel</title><link>http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/#comment-361917293</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The repeal bill would need 60 votes in the 100-member Senate, and sponsors acknowledged the votes aren't there. The measure would have no chance in the ... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Soft Chewable Lovegra</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:48:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guns in church bill shot down by Arkansas Senate panel</title><link>http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/#comment-213700914</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Buffalo held its fourth gun buyback Saturday, and police collected more than 600 firearms at sevenchurches throughout the city. The no-questions-asked program yielded more than 200 nonworkingguns, 170 rifles,  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dogging</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 04:13:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guns in church bill shot down by Arkansas Senate panel</title><link>http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/#comment-157597632</link><description>&lt;p&gt;D'Amato took over as chairman of a special Whitewater committee in the Senate. He may have genuinely expected to uncover a smoking gun that would bring the president down, but his crusading succeeded only in lowering his poll numbers back in New York. ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">søgemaskineoptimering</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 04:39:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guns in church bill shot down by Arkansas Senate panel</title><link>http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/#comment-121015632</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Folks, Senate Bill 1070 — quite frankly, all it does is it allows Arizona law enforcement officers to enforce federal law. It's already the law. ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">how to lose weight fast</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 01:31:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guns in church bill shot down by Arkansas Senate panel</title><link>http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/#comment-6700988</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice points.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Niguel Valley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:14:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guns in church bill shot down by Arkansas Senate panel</title><link>http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/#comment-6700161</link><description>&lt;p&gt;	&lt;br&gt;I was talking to one of my former college roommates about this whole thing and he mentioned something out that we tend to forget about although it's a logical concept. Usually when we are in church, our backs are facing the doors. How would you stop an armed person when you did not have the split-second time to react? Especially if your first clue that there is an incident is the gunfire from the incident? The person with the carry permit trying to return fire to the shooter would have to identify correctly said shoot in the midst of pandemonium and In the close quarters of the building. And that is just part of the practical/logistical reason for not getting into this -- leave the protection services to the trained professionals. Shooting wildlife and protecting innocent lives in distress are completely different disciplines. A carry permit does not prepare you for these circumstances.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony K. Valley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:37:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guns in church bill shot down by Arkansas Senate panel</title><link>http://www.anthonykvalley.com/2009/02/26/guns-in-church-bill-shot-down-by-arkansas-senate-panel/#comment-6657161</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with you. With the number of church shootings, which is amazing, trained professionals should be near the house of worship if it's considered unsafe. Small congregations, who may not be able to afford security, may already know of some pending threat to a congregation. Larger congregation, in my opinion, should have security by default.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Niguel Valley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:13:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>